Talk:Holy Shit, Jeff's Back!/Notes

Tweet
Yeah, I am not sure if that tweet is really noteworthy because American Dad! was allowed to say "shit" two seasons ago while it was still on FOX. ~Curious Poker Chip 4:27 p.m. May 23th, 2014 (Pacific)

We may reevaluate it at broadcast time. Right now, it fills a need for fans wanting to know about the episode. --Buckimion (talk) 23:29, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

Not exactly sure how that is when it basically has no actually information about the episode, but I am not the admin of course. ~Curious Poker Chip 4:43 p.m. May 23rd, 2014 (Pacific)

I believe yourself, as well as MANY others wanted to know if that was really the title. I think that helps support that. At the very least, it's good for a chuckle. --Buckimion (talk) 23:51, May 23, 2014 (UTC)

References to various Sci-fi films and series
In this picture, you can see a TIE Fighter wing, a Dalek and a giant Cylon helmet. Han Solo's blaster was also seen in the episode and that was put into Notes. This should also be put in as well, I presume.KordaSix (talk) 16:06, August 13, 2015 (UTC)KordaSix

Separate it into a second entry, but ok. --Buckimion (talk) 16:09, August 13, 2015 (UTC)

I noticed that the alien race in this episode responsible for dissecting Jeff are called the Collectors. I noticed some parallels with a race in the Mass Effect series, also called the Collectors. They're both enigmatic (though more apparently in Mass Effect), they both have abducted various other species and both perform experiments on those they capture, and they also share the same name, though American Dad's Collectors and Mass Effect's Collectors look nothing like each other. I also feel like the ship's overall exterior and interior design somewhat resemble the Collector's base in the Mass Effect series (almost like an insect hive). I don't know if the Collectors in this episode were meant to reference Mass Effect but they are pretty similar to Mass Effect's Collectors. For the record, it's automatically saying that I'm the owner of this Wiki - obviously that isn't true. Maybe it's because I have my own Wiki that I plan on closing down pretty soon. LOLZpersonok - Owner of this Wiki (talk) 14:14, June 3, 2016 (UTC)LOLZpersonok

Claiming a resemblance falls under personal opinion and isn't permitted in virtually any circumstance. There has to be conclusive evidence, or at least a strong likelihood based on known habits, that the staff intentionally used a design. --Buckimion (talk) 14:19, June 3, 2016 (UTC)

I wasn't trying to say that "they totally based it on this", I just wanted to point out the similarities. That's why I didn't want to put it on the main article because I knew I couldn't prove it. I don't know how well I stated my thoughts above and I simply didn't realize that I was committing a severe offence - most Wikia sites permit such heresy. My thoughts are gone. Again - no idea why it's saying I'm the owner of this Wiki. LOLZpersonok - Owner of this Wiki (talk) 14:34, June 3, 2016 (UTC)LOLZpersonok

Yeah, I kind of realized that after responding. Still, the qualifications are not there. --Buckimion (talk) 14:36, June 3, 2016 (UTC)