User talk:Agitowatch

Please review the editing guides above. You may not rewrite descriptions under the pretense of grammar or other excuses, stick to true misspellings. Your images were also of such poor quality we cannot use them, nor do we use thumbnails. Buckimion (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

We also do not permit parenthesis in narrations. This is poor writing. Buckimion (talk) 22:15, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Hi, sorry for any unintentional trouble, I was attempting to edit the description pages since the sentences previously were not entirely coherent. Perhaps the use of the term "Grammer" to describe my edits were insufficient and I apologize. I will also refrain from using parenthesis in narrations if that is the preferred guideline. I only wanted to added the thumbnail of Brian being at the wedding, so as to provide a clear picture of the scene listed in the trivia, if the picture is of poor quality, I don't mind that it is removed. If possible I would like to continue editing the articles if they need to be please.

Sentences not being coherent is your personal opinion. As stated, we will accept spelling corrections or perhaps commas where needed. Buckimion (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Noted with thanks. To clarify, if I am unblocked is it not within guidelines to edit slightly inappropriate phrasings such as "however, but.."? Or does the above phrasing in your opinion not warrant any changes

I don't see any of your previous changes where such omission would be warranted. I also noted several cases where you tried to insert character's names right after they previously been mentioned, which we would consider repetitive. Buckimion (talk) 23:21, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

The exact "However, but.." incident in question I will try to link a screenshot of. As for cases where I reinsert names after they have been supposedly mentioned, would be after there is a mention of a new character and I repeat the name to ensure the reader can follow who is being referenced in the particular instance. If you feel however readers would be able to follow the article with no difficulty I will concede and refrain from doing so in future

The omission of a single comma clarified that without disrupting the entire original statement. Buckimion (talk) 01:08, 7 November 2021 (UTC)